As human beings we respond instinctively and from very primitive parts of our brain when faced with overwhelming threat such as trauma. Researchers have identified five innate and automatic responses to threat which dictate much of our behaviour. Understanding this helps to explain why people respond the way they do during abuse and how many people carry these automatic reactions through the rest of life.

Many people have heard of the ‘fight or flight’ response but these are just two of five predictable patterns of responding to threatening situations, all of which can be represented by the letter ‘F’. We tend to respond on a sliding scale, depending on how serious the threat.

Friend

The first defensive strategy available to us is ‘Friend’. A newborn baby, who is otherwise immobile and defenceless, has this strategy immediately and can cry for attention and to elicit help. The strategy is to invite a caregiver to come close. After about 4-6 weeks a baby begins to develop a wider repertoire of eliciting care and attention, including smiling. Later on, with improved motor function, a baby can raise their arms to be picked up and with crawling and walking they can move towards their safe person. So this ‘friend’ approach (also known as attachment) is based on a small person encouraging contact and protection from a big person. As adults, when in danger we turn to others to help us: if our car has broken down, we may call a partner, a friend or the RAC! (Interestingly this ‘social engagement system’ is often damaged in abuse survivors and they are either less likely to ask for help or to ask for help inappropriately for everything, having little confidence in their own abilities to solve a situation or protect themselves.)

Fight

The second defensive response, if ‘Friend’ doesn’t work, is ‘Fight’. When threatened, we might respond with overt aggression or more subtle ‘fight behaviours’ such as saying ‘no’.

Flight

The third defensive response is ‘Flight’. This involves any means of putting distance between the individual and the threat—the most obvious is running away. For both the ‘fight’ and ‘flight’ responses, the brain releases a cascade of hormones that provide increased energy to the large muscles. This is the rush of energy associated with anger (a ‘fight’ response) such as clenched fists and jaw, tension in the shoulders, and the heart-pounding and shakiness we experience when we have just had a near-miss in the car: it is the adrenaline in our bloodstream which was provided in milliseconds to enable us to respond. This all happens before we have had time to consciously think and plan, because it is mediated by very primitive, instinctive parts of our brains.

Freeze

When the brain perceives that friend, fight and flight will not work, it elicits from the body a ‘freeze’ response. It is thought that the immobility produced by a freeze response has a number of advantages from a survival perspective, including not being detected by a predator. But the body is also flooded with ‘homemade heroin’, otherwise known as endogenous opioids, and there is a protective numbing of the body and mind in the event of inevitable harm. Being immobile prevents further injury when wounded and allows the body the best chance to survive and recover. The ‘freeze’ response is exceptionally common in child sexual abuse, as the child’s brain automatically perceives that ‘friend’, ‘fight’ and ‘flight’ will not be effective due to the abuser’s aggression and superior size and strength. Therefore the brain kicks into a ‘freeze’ response and the child is literally frozen and paralysed. Unfortunately many abusers take this response to mean consent, and many survivors feel terrible shame for not having fought back or tried to escape. However, they had no choice in the matter as this was literally an automatic body response.

Flop

If the freeze mechanism fails, the final defensive strategy is employed, which is to ‘flop’. This is a state of total submission when all the muscles go floppy and both the body and mind become malleable. Much of the ‘higher thinking’ processes in the brain are shut off at this point, and so this is the zombie-like submission where people do what they are told and do not protest at all about what is happening to them.

 

Which ‘F’ is engaged at any point will depend on a number of factors, principally what is likely to best promote survival and what has been successful or unsuccessful in the past. It is this element of past experience which has a huge bearing on the automatic responses of abuse survivors. Even as adults they are likely to go straight into a ‘freeze’ or ‘flop’ response when faced with fairly minor current-day threats (or even just perception of threats) because ‘friend’, ‘fight’ and ‘flight’ were so ineffective for them in the past.

 

© PODS 2012

About the Author

Carolyn Spring Google Plus

Carolyn Spring is Director of PODS and developed dissociative identity disorder (DID) as a result of organised abuse in childhood. After studying at Cambridge University, she worked for a number of years in Children's Social Care supporting at-risk families and caring for children who had suffered abuse and neglect. She also has a background in business, having been involved in running small businesses for a number of years, with experience in marketing, website design, IT and training.

Carolyn is also Director of START (Survivors Trauma and Abuse Recovery Trust), the charity running PODS, which enables people to recover from childhood abuse and live healthy lives, both physically and mentally. She is also author of Recovery is my best revenge: my experience of trauma, abuse and dissociation.